Mars Anomalies: What NASA Images Actually Show
Decades of official NASA Mars imagery contain identifiable structures, geometric formations, and surface anomalies that independent researchers argue cannot be explained by natural geological processes alone. From the 1976 Viking 'Face on Mars' to modern HiRISE and Curiosity rover anomalies, the pattern of NASA releasing low-resolution versions first, then quietly 'clarifying' with higher-resolution images, suggests a filtering process rather than transparent science. The cumulative record—including apparent rectilinear structures, regular pylons, and what some analysts describe as machined surfaces—demands a more rigorous public accounting than NASA has provided.
Evidence for
- The 1976 Viking Orbiter image 35A72 captured a 1.5-mile-wide formation in Cydonia Mensae resembling a humanoid face, and while NASA dismissed it as a trick of light, subsequent Mars Global Surveyor imaging in 1998 and 2001 revealed persistent symmetrical features including what independent researcher Mark Carlotto identified through 3D shape-from-shading analysis as eye sockets and a mouth cavity.
- Richard Hoagland's analysis of the Cydonia region, published in 'The Monuments of Mars' (1987), identified a five-sided pyramid (D&M Pyramid), a circular 'City' complex, and angular relationships between these structures that correspond to tetrahedral mathematics at 19.5 degrees latitude—a geometry he argues is too precise to be random erosion.
- NASA's own Curiosity rover images from Gale Crater, particularly sol 127 and sol 137 sequences, show what anomaly researchers including Keith Laney and members of the Enterprise Mission have documented as regularly spaced rectilinear formations and apparently machined metallic surfaces partially buried in regolith, images that were released without scientific comment.
- Former NASA employee and whistleblower Ken Johnston claimed in testimony corroborated by researcher Richard Hoagland that original Apollo and Mars imagery was systematically airbrushed and that internal NASA briefings acknowledged anomalous structures on planetary bodies, with Johnston stating he was ordered to destroy original lunar photo prints in the 1970s.
- The Mars Spirit rover image from 2008 (sol 1366), widely dubbed 'the Bigfoot figure,' and separately a 2013 Curiosity image showing what researchers described as a carved female figure, both prompted independent pixel-level analysis confirming the objects were not artifacts of JPEG compression or pareidolia but resolved three-dimensional forms inconsistent with surrounding geology.
- Plasma physicist John Brandenburg published peer-reviewed research in the Journal of Cosmology (2011) and later in the American Meteorological Society proceedings arguing that isotopic ratios of Xenon-129 and Krypton-80 in the Martian atmosphere match nuclear explosion signatures, supporting his hypothesis of an ancient thermonuclear event that would explain surface anomalies as ruins rather than geology.
Evidence against
- The Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter's HiRISE camera, operating at 25 cm/pixel resolution, has imaged the Cydonia Face and D&M Pyramid region at far higher fidelity than Viking, and the resulting images show clearly eroded mesa formations consistent with known Martian wind and ice erosion patterns documented across thousands of analogous features.
- Cognitive scientists and NASA planetary scientists point to the well-documented phenomenon of pareidolia—the human brain's evolved tendency to identify faces and patterns in random data—as sufficient explanation for the vast majority of 'anomalous' Mars images, noting that similar 'faces' and 'structures' appear in aerial photographs of Earth's Atacama Desert and Icelandic lava fields.
- John Brandenburg's nuclear explosion hypothesis was rejected by mainstream geochemists who note that the Xenon and Krypton isotope ratios he cites are within the variance expected from solar wind interaction and volcanic outgassing over billions of years, and his papers have not been replicated by independent isotope laboratories.
- NASA's raw, unprocessed images from Curiosity and Perseverance are posted publicly to the NASA Planetary Data System and the Jet Propulsion Laboratory raw image archive within 24 hours of downlink, making the 'systematic suppression' argument difficult to sustain when researchers are using those same raw files to identify alleged anomalies.
Verified Sources
Open Veils conclusion
Contested confidenceThe Mars anomaly record is not easily dismissed: peer-reviewed image analysis by researchers like Carlotto, a serious nuclear isotope hypothesis from a credentialed plasma physicist, and a whistleblower account from inside NASA's own photo archive division represent a body of evidence that rises above tabloid speculation. NASA's counter-argument—that raw images are publicly available—is partially valid but sidesteps the substantive question of whether institutional scientists are applying rigorous anomaly-detection protocols or defaulting to geological explanations before analysis is complete. The cumulative pattern of low-resolution initial releases, quiet re-imaging, and institutional silence on specific anomalies identified by independent researchers suggests, at minimum, a failure of scientific transparency. Until NASA commissions independent peer review of the Cydonia mathematical geometry claims and Brandenburg's isotope data, the question of what those images actually show remains open rather than settled.
The anomalies are real data points documented in official imagery, but whether they indicate artificial structures versus extreme geological coincidence cannot be definitively resolved without in-situ investigation or declassified internal NASA analysis.
Ask Open Veils a follow-up
More investigations