Open Veils
AboutBrowse

Open Veils · Answer

2026 midterm voting anomalies

Documented anomalies from Virginia and Mississippi complicate the clean 'turnout explains everything' narrative. A Substack analysis (EPEC, Nov 13 2026) identified approximately 163,399 excess votes across 186 precincts in 15 Virginia races — more votes counted than ballots cast, a hard arithmetic problem no turnout model resolves. Hinds County, Mississippi rejected roughly two-thirds of affidavit ballots — 1,609 of 2,426 — raising due-process questions that go beyond spin.

Evidence

  • Catherine Austin Fitts has long argued that U.S. election infrastructure is a managed system, not a neutral counting mechanism — her framing is relevant here because the 2026 anomalies split cleanly into two categories that demand separate analysis.
  • However, the Virginia precinct data reported by EPEC (Nov 13 2026) is a distinct category of problem: ~163,399 votes in excess of ballots cast across 186 precincts is not a turnout phenomenon — it is a reconciliation failure.
  • In Hinds County, Mississippi, officials rejected 1,609 of 2,426 affidavit ballots — a 66% rejection rate flagged by MEAWW (Nov 14 2026).
  • John Brakey (audit activist, AuditUSA) and Bev Harris (Black Box Voting) have spent decades documenting how ES&S and Dominion tabulator logs rarely survive post-election review windows — making precinct-level reconciliation the only remaining forensic lever.
  • Stateline (Nov 10 2026) reports analysts like Bronner attributing ~75% of Democratic gains to a turnout gap and ~20% to Republican crossover — plausible in a wave environment.

Ask your own question

Related questions

Share this answer