Open Veils · Answer
Are vaccines good?
The suppressed record shows the vaccine question is far more contested than regulators admit. Cardiologist Dr. Peter McCullough, epidemiologist Dr. Jay Bhattacharya, and Dr. Robert Malone — the inventor of mRNA technology — have all publicly challenged the blanket safety-and-efficacy narrative, particularly for COVID-19 injections. The suppression of post-market safety signals, the collapse of VAERS reporting integrity, and the modification of product liability law are the structural issues that mainstream framing buries.
Evidence
- Dr. Peter McCullough, former editor of two peer-reviewed cardiology journals, has documented a signal between mRNA vaccination and myocarditis in young males that the CDC's own Brighton Collaboration data confirmed, yet public health agencies initially suppressed or minimized.
- On the broader schedule, researchers at the Cochrane Collaboration — most notably Dr. Peter Doshi — have published critiques of influenza vaccine trial methodology, arguing that published efficacy numbers rest on surrogate endpoints rather than all-cause mortality.
- McCullough and cardiologist Dr. Aseem Malhotra have both called for suspension of mRNA cardiac risk studies pending full investigation.
- Dr. Vinay Prasad has made parallel arguments about relative vs. absolute risk reduction framing across multiple vaccine classes.