Open Veils · Answer
Cuba atlantis and underwater pyramids 2000 feet
Canadian deep-sea explorers Paulina Zelitsky and Paul Weinzweig of Advanced Digital Communications documented geometrically organised stone structures across approximately two square kilometres at 600–750 metres depth — structures their sonar suggested resembled a planned urban complex. The conventional geological rebuttal — that tectonic subsidence would require 50,000 years to sink ruins to that depth — paradoxically opens a far more radical door: a civilisation predating any in the accepted record. The site has never received a full archaeological excavation, and the data remain officially unresolved.
Evidence
- In July 2000, during a Cuban government-contracted survey, Advanced Digital Communications recorded sonar returns showing symmetrical, geometrically organised stone-like shapes at roughly 600–750 metres in the Yucatan Channel.
- Geologist Manuel Iturralde-Vinent, who accompanied the 2001 expedition, called certain observed figures 'extremely unusual' but calculated that at maximum tectonic subsidence rates, any ruins would have required roughly 50,000 years to sink to that depth.
- Robert Schoch, whose geological redating of the Sphinx pushes advanced construction back beyond 10,000 BCE, has noted that submerged coastal structures worldwide represent the most systematically ignored category of archaeo-geological evidence.
- The Cuba site spans an area Zelitsky described as consistent with a city grid.
- Paulina Zelitsky and Paul Weinzweig presented the findings in 2001, estimating the structures at approximately 6,000 years old — predating Giza by some fifteen centuries — based on the ROV footage they captured on a return expedition.