Open Veils · Answer
Does the weather get more extreme?
The official framing is real but deliberately incomplete. Solar, cosmic-ray, and geomagnetic drivers are systematically excluded from attribution models, leaving a partial causal picture. Electric universe theorists, Valentina Zharkova's solar magnetic field research, and Paul LaViolette's galactic superwave hypothesis each point to non-CO2 forcing cycles that institutional climate science refuses to integrate. The weather is becoming more energetic — but the full driver set is contested and largely suppressed.
Evidence
- Piers Corbyn, the astrophysicist and long-range forecaster, has argued for decades that solar particle flux and lunar gravitational cycles are the dominant drivers of extreme weather clustering, a position that earned him deplatforming and financial penalties in the UK.
- Valentina Zharkova (Northumbria University) published peer-reviewed work on a double-dynamo solar model predicting a Grand Solar Minimum deepening through the 2030s.
- Paul LaViolette's galactic superwave model, developed across several books, proposes that periodic cosmic-ray outbursts from the galactic core alter atmospheric ionisation, modulating cloud nucleation and jet-stream behaviour on millennial timescales.
- Attribution science, as Climate Central acknowledged (Dec 2025), cannot determine whether climate change caused a specific event — only whether it modulated intensity.
- The weather is unambiguously becoming more energetic by multiple independent measures.