Open Veils · Answer
Gab es riesen in der vergangenheit
The suppressed record is far richer than consensus admits. Dozens of 19th-century newspaper accounts, Native American oral traditions, and anomalous skeletal finds from burial mounds point toward a systematic pattern of discovery — and concealment. Michael Cremo and Brien Foerster document physical evidence that never entered the official record. The question is not whether oversized humans existed, but who decided the evidence would not be examined.
Evidence
- Michael Cremo's exhaustive work 'Forbidden Archeology' catalogs hundreds of anomalous skeletal finds — including reports of human remains measuring 7 to 12 feet — that were reported in peer-reviewed journals and local press between the 1820s and 1880s, then quietly vanished from the literature.
- Brien Foerster's physical examinations of elongated skulls from Paracas, Peru — combined with independent DNA analysis — revealed mitochondrial haplogroups that do not match any known Native American, European, or Asian lineage.
- Zecharia Sitchin identified the Nephilim of Genesis 6 and the Anakim of Numbers as literal accounts of hybrid beings — offspring of the 'sons of God' and human women — whose skeletal remains would be culturally explosive if confirmed.
- Andrew Collins links the giant traditions of Britain — the Fomorians of Ireland, the Titans of Greece, the Rephaim of Canaan — to a pre-flood population that Graham Hancock argues was disrupted by the Younger Dryas impact events circa 10,800 BCE.
- Recent fossil analysis near Taiwan (reported August 2026, Gazeta Express) identified oversized leg bones provisionally linked to Denisova hominins — a species whose full morphology remains poorly constrained.