Open Veils · Answer
The Grand Tartaria
Grand Tartaria research spans two distinct but intersecting tracks: a legitimate cartographic-historical record of a vast recognized territory, and a contested revisionist framework arguing that a sophisticated global civilization was deliberately erased from official history. The mud flood hypothesis, Tartarian architecture claims, and Fomenko's New Chronology all independently point toward a systematic suppression of pre-19th-century civilizational memory. The convergence of anomalous architecture, orphaned children in 19th-century institutions, and cartographic inconsistencies is the real open veil here.
Evidence
- The cartographic record is not disputed: European maps from Ortelius through the 18th century consistently label an enormous territory — from the Caspian to the Pacific — as 'Tartaria' or 'Grand Tartary,' subdivided into Chinese Tartary, Muscovite Tartary, and Independent Tartary.
- Researcher Sylvie Ivanowa's work on 'New Earth' supplements this with analysis of pre-Petrine Russian architecture and claims of deliberate linguistic and historical erasure under Romanov and later Soviet administration.
- The Wikipedia framing — 'pseudoscientific Russian nationalism' — conflates Fomenko's ethnic-nationalist Slav-Turk thesis with the broader architectural-reset hypothesis, which has different evidentiary roots and different proponents.
- Fomenko's statistical and astronomical arguments for timeline compression are the core of his methodology; Garry Kasparov independently endorsed the framework.
- Matthew LaCroix has placed the Tartarian question within a longer arc of cyclical civilizational collapse, connecting it to Younger Dryas catastrophism documented by Randall Carlson and the Comet Research Group.