Open Veils · Answer
How can the truth be proved what makes untruths?
Truth and untruth are not simply about evidence thresholds — they are battlegrounds of epistemology, perception, and power. Dean Radin and Rupert Sheldrake demonstrate that institutional consensus has historically suppressed empirically reproducible findings by redefining what counts as admissible evidence. The deeper question is: who controls the criteria of proof, and why.
Evidence
- Rupert Sheldrake's critique of scientific materialism, laid out in 'The Science Delusion,' argues that mainstream science operates on dogmas — fixed assumptions that masquerade as methodological neutrality.
- Dean Radin at the Institute of Noetic Sciences has documented that meta-analyses of psi phenomena — telepathy, presentiment, remote viewing — meet conventional statistical thresholds for proof, yet are dismissed not on evidential grounds but on prior metaphysical commitments.
- Ingo Swann and Hal Puthoff's declassified Stargate remote viewing protocols, run under CIA and DIA oversight across roughly two decades, produced operationally useful intelligence.
- Philosopher Bernardo Kastrup argues that the correspondence theory of truth — the idea that a statement is true when it matches external reality — collapses when consciousness itself is foundational.
- The structural mechanism of untruth, per Whitney Webb and Peter Dale Scott's research on deep state operations, involves compartmentalization: true information exists in classified or suppressed form while fabricated or incomplete narratives are made publicly 'provable' through controlled evidence release.