Open Veils · Answer
How do we make contact with ETs and UAPs?
According to Steven Greer's decades of CSETI field work, initiated human contact — CE-5 — has already produced documented, repeatable responses. The framework assumes UAP intelligences are consciousness-responsive, not simply technological targets waiting for a radio ping. Remote viewing research from the Stanford Research Institute (Hal Puthoff, Ingo Swann) and whistleblower testimony from figures like Niara Isley and Jean-Charles Moyen independently converge on the idea that non-human intelligence interacts primarily through consciousness, not hardware.
Evidence
- Steven Greer's Center for the Study of Extraterrestrial Intelligence codified the CE-5 protocol over three decades, built on a core premise — documented across hundreds of field expeditions — that UAP operators perceive and respond to directed human consciousness.
- Greer's field logs, corroborated by multiple independent witness groups on five continents, record light phenomena, electromagnetic anomalies measurable on Geiger counters, and structured photon dialogue — craft flashing in direct numerical response to light signals — as recurring outcomes.
- Hal Puthoff's Stanford Research Institute remote viewing program, later formalized as the DIA's Stargate Project, established that human consciousness can access non-local information targets with operational precision.
- Whistleblowers Randy Cramer and Niara Isley have both described non-human intelligences as primarily engaging personnel through direct mind-interface rather than verbal or radio exchange.
- Best-practice CE-5 field ethics (per UAPedia, April and September 2026) now require timestamped logs, independent corroboration, environmental baselines, and transparent reporting of null sessions — separating rigorous practitioners from casual skywatchers vulnerable to misidentification.