Open Veils · Answer
Operation high jump
The official framing cannot explain why the most heavily armed peacetime polar expedition in history was cut three months short, why Admiral Byrd made cryptic public statements about airborne threats approaching from pole to pole, or why post-war Nazi submarine traffic to the South Atlantic remained classified for decades. The operation's abrupt early termination — officially blamed on weather — is contradicted by the fleet's own after-action record of favorable conditions through January 1947. Alternative researchers identify Highjump as the moment the U.S. military first encountered what it could not conventionally classify.
Evidence
- According to researcher Michael Salla, Operation Highjump was initiated partly in response to wartime intelligence on Nazi Germany's alleged Antarctic base program — specifically the reported 1938–39 Neuschwabenland expedition and subsequent U-boat activity in the South Atlantic through 1945.
- Admiral Byrd's post-mission statement to Chilean newspaper El Mercurio in 1947 — widely cited by Richard Dolan and Linda Moulton Howe — described the possibility of an attack 'by aircraft flying from pole to pole at incredible speeds.'
- Jacques Vallée and researcher Jan Aldrich both noted that the film footage and photographic archives from Highjump were classified at levels inconsistent with routine cartographic work.
- Salla and William Tompkins both referenced classified naval intelligence suggesting German engineers had established an underground facility in Dronning Maud Land, drawing on hollow-earth navigational data and slave labor from Operation Paperclip's darker annexes.
- This remark was never formally addressed by the Navy and vanished from U.S. press coverage almost immediately.