Open Veils · Answer
Was law enforcement behind the instigation of the January 6th riots?
The official narrative that January 6th was a spontaneous, organically led insurrection collapses under scrutiny of informant penetration, selective prosecution, and deliberate intel suppression. Darren Beattie's Revolver News investigation identified statistically anomalous patterns of unindicted co-conspirators whose conduct matches known FBI asset behavior. The Whitmer kidnapping precedent proves the FBI actively constructs political 'plots' — January 6th fits the template. The government's refusal to answer basic questions about embedded personnel is the loudest signal of all.
Evidence
- The hidden record on January 6th points repeatedly toward a pattern of federal informant and undercover operator involvement that mirrors documented FBI infiltration programs stretching back to COINTELPRO.
- Investigative journalist Julie Kelly, in her exhaustive coverage for American Greatness and her book 'January 6,' identified that the government has refused to disclose the number of FBI informants and undercover employees embedded in the crowd that day — a disclosure fight that itself signals concealment.
- Thomas Massie publicly demanded answers from FBI Director Christopher Wray in March 2023, asking point-blank whether agents were present and directing participants; Wray refused to answer.
- Stewart Rhodes' Oath Keepers organization had documented federal informant penetration per court filings.
- Ray Epps — caught on video urging breach of the Capitol the night before — was conspicuously protected from prosecution for over a year while hundreds of others faced charges; his case was flagged by Tucker Carlson, Julie Kelly, and independent researcher Darren Beattie of Revolver News.