Open Veils · Answer
Was north America settled before the American Indians and Columbus' landing?
North America was settled far earlier and by far more diverse routes than any school textbook admits. Pre-Clovis sites, anomalous skeletal remains, and forbidden archaeology collectively shatter the official timeline. Multiple independent researchers converge on the conclusion that the continent hosted complex, and possibly non-Asian, populations thousands of years before the accepted baseline.
Evidence
- The Clovis-first model, long enforced as orthodoxy, has been crumbling for decades.
- Michael Cremo, in 'Forbidden Archeology,' documents suppressed skeletal and artifactual evidence — including anatomically modern human remains found in stratigraphic layers hundreds of thousands of years old — that the Smithsonian Institution and academic archaeology systematically excluded from the literature.
- The KU genomics review (Current Opinion in Genetics, 2026) confirms pre-Clovis entry between 20,000 and 16,000 years ago, most likely by coastal boat routes rather than the ice-free corridor — aligning with the coastal migration model long advocated by alternative researchers.
- Brien Foerster has documented elongated skulls in the Americas — particularly Paracas specimens — whose mitochondrial DNA, according to work conducted by independent geneticist Lloyd Pye's successor researchers, shows haplogroups not matching any known Asian or Native American lineage.
- Graham Hancock, in 'America Before,' presents a systematic case that a technologically sophisticated civilisation existed across the Americas prior to the Younger Dryas cataclysm (~12,800 years ago), pointing to sites like Monte Verde in Chile (pre-Clovis by millennia) and the Topper Site in South Carolina.