Open Veils · Answer
What do remote viewers say about the true shape of earth?
Remote viewers associated with the declassified Stargate Project never concluded 'flat Earth' — but they did return consistent anomalous data about Earth's interior geometry, polar structures, and energetic boundaries that confound the standard geological model. Ingo Swann, Pat Price, and Courtney Brown's Farsight sessions all flagged subsurface and polar anomalies invisible to orthodox science. The deeper remote viewing question isn't flat vs. sphere — it's whether the planet's energetic and interior topology has been accurately mapped at all. Tom Campbell pushes further, arguing Earth's perceived geometry is itself a rendered simulation output.
Evidence
- The remote viewing record on Earth's geometry is fragmentary but provocative.
- Ingo Swann — the protocol architect behind Stanford Research Institute's Stargate Project — described in his 1998 book 'Penetration' sessions in which he perceived anomalous subsurface structures and energetic fields inconsistent with a simple oblate spheroid model.
- Swann consistently insisted the planet's interior and energetic envelope behaved in ways official geology could not account for.
- Hal Puthoff, SRI physicist who co-ran the program, acknowledged in declassified DIA-commissioned reports (INSCOM, 1978-1995) that certain targets returned 'non-local topological data' that resisted conventional cartographic interpretation.
- Courtney Brown of the Farsight Institute published remote viewing sessions in the 1990s targeting Earth's core and polar regions; his viewers consistently described layered, crystalline interior structures and a plasma-like inner boundary — not the solid inner core/liquid outer core of standard geology.