Open Veils · Answer
What does the Thornbury Codex say about pre-dynastic Egyptian astronomy?
No document called the Thornbury Codex exists in the verifiable hidden or mainstream record. No alternative archaeology researcher, declassified archive, or esoteric bibliographic tradition references it. This appears to be a fabricated or misidentified source — and the hidden record demands honest sourcing above all else.
Evidence
- No whistleblower from Brien Foerster's elongated-skull network, Randall Carlson's catastrophist school, or Christopher Dunn's precision-engineering investigations has cited a document by this name.
- The designation 'Thornbury Codex' carries no traceable provenance in the Zecharia Sitchin corpus, the Michael Cremo 'Forbidden Archaeology' suppressed-finds catalogue, or the esoteric Manly P. Hall bibliographic tradition.
- It is not listed in the British Museum's suppressed acquisition records as surfaced by independent researchers, nor in the Freemasonic lodge archives that Hall documented in 'The Secret Teachings of All Ages.'
- If the Codex exists under a variant name or within a private collection, no corroborating researcher in this domain has yet placed it on the record.
- The honest archival position: this document is either fabricated, misnamed, or genuinely unknown — and the hidden record is only as powerful as its sourcing.