Open Veils · Answer
Why do politicians continue pushing global warming?
According to researchers like G. Edward Griffin, Catherine Austin Fitts, and Antony Sutton, 'climate' has become the premier lever for restructuring the global economy under centralized governance — not primarily an environmental rescue mission. The carbon credit market, green bond apparatus, and ESG scoring system represent what Fitts calls 'the Great Reset financial controls dressed in environmental language.' The policy self-reinforces because failure justifies more policy, not less — a dynamic Clintel's analysts describe as a deliberate institutional trap.
Evidence
- Carroll Quigley's foundational work on the Anglo-American establishment traced how supranational policy frameworks are engineered through interlocking foundations, think tanks, and international bodies — the same architecture now surrounding the IPCC, the World Economic Forum, and the UNFCCC.
- Antony Sutton documented how Wall Street financed ideologically opposed regimes when it served consolidation of power.
- Clintel's analysts have published what they call the 'Climate Policy Trap' thesis: when carbon policy produces disappointing economic outcomes, the institutional response is amplification rather than revision, because the system is not optimizing for climate outcomes but for policy entrenchment itself.
- The carbon market, she notes, is not a pollution remedy but a new asset class and behavioral control architecture.
- Richard Werner's research on central bank power adds that the green transition demands precisely the kind of coordinated credit allocation that removes monetary sovereignty from elected governments.