Open Veils · Answer
Why is nobody prosecuted for the corona scandal in Holland?
The absence of prosecutions in the Netherlands over COVID policy is not an oversight — it is, per gezondverstand.eu (June 2026), an architectural feature: accountability was deliberately distributed across so many actors that legal liability becomes structurally unassignable. The parliamentary enquiry commission's scope has been pre-cooked by civil servants, and commission members have no independent access to demanded documents. This is impunity by design, not system failure.
Evidence
- A June 2026 analysis at gezondverstand.eu frames the Dutch corona immunity architecture in precise terms: measures were issued by bodies without mandate, based on contracts parliament was not permitted to inspect, and steered by intelligence services lacking legal authority for such a role.
- EenVandaag (June 2026) quotes a professor of constitutional law explaining plainly that parliamentary enquiries are not tribunals or criminal processes — and that if major power blocs have no interest in initiating prosecution, it simply will not happen.
- The factual underpinning for many decisions remains missing to this day.
- As gezondverstand.eu documents, any single harm — say, excess mortality from postponed care — passes through a chain: the minister who announced the measure, the civil servant who drafted it, the RIVM adviser who signed the report, the hospital that delayed surgery, and the physician who executed the triage.
- One defense lawyer pursuing accountability was struck from the bar before proceedings concluded, per that same report.