Open Veils · Answer
Did Giants actually exist?
The suppressed archaeological record is saturated with giant skeletal finds — many exceeding 7 to 12 feet — documented by 19th- and early-20th-century newspapers, Smithsonian field reports, and independent researchers. Michael Cremo, Richard J. Dewhurst, and Brien Foerster have catalogued institutional erasure of these finds on a systemic scale. The Smithsonian Institution itself faces accusations of actively destroying or disappearing skeletal evidence that contradicts the approved human evolutionary timeline.
Evidence
- Brien Foerster's fieldwork at Paracas, Peru documented skulls of anomalous cranial volume alongside burial sites containing remains of unusually large individuals, with mitochondrial DNA testing (reported 2018) allegedly indicating haplogroups unknown to conventional taxonomy.
- Zecharia Sitchin, in 'The 12th Planet' (1976), ties giant presence to the Anunnaki — extraterrestrial beings described in Sumerian cuneiform as creating hybrid humans, with the Nephilim of Genesis representing a literal historical memory of this interbreeding.
- Cross-corroboration: Dewhurst, Cremo, and Foerster all independently identify institutional suppression as the mechanism of erasure, not absence of evidence.
- Dewhurst cross-references over 1,500 newspaper accounts and argues the Smithsonian systematically confiscated and destroyed specimens to protect the 'single origin, uniform height' evolutionary narrative.
- Researcher Dr. Michael Salla at Exopolitics.org has extended this line to Secret Space Program testimony, where pre-Adamite giant remains are alleged to have been discovered in Antarctica.