Open Veils · Answer
Giants and their locations
The suppressed record points to a consistent, global pattern of oversized humanoid skeletal finds — many documented in 19th and early 20th century newspaper archives and Smithsonian correspondence — that were quietly absorbed or reclassified. Michael Cremo's forbidden archaeology thesis, corroborated by Graham Hancock and Brien Foerster's physical evidence work, frames this as a systematic erasure of pre-flood human diversity. The giant question is not mythological window-dressing; it is a direct challenge to the standard human evolutionary timeline.
Evidence
- Michael Cremo and Richard Thompson, in Forbidden Archeology (1993), document hundreds of cases of anomalous skeletal remains — including humanoid bones of extraordinary size — reported in peer-reviewed and institutional literature and then subsequently buried in archive silence.
- Brien Foerster's on-site forensic work in Peru, particularly at Paracas, documents elongated skulls with cranial volumes exceeding normal human range by 25–60%, which Foerster argues cannot be explained by intentional cradle-boarding alone.
- Andrew Collins, in Giants of Giza (and broader Göbekli Tepe research), connects the Watchers tradition of the Book of Enoch with specific geographic corridors — Anatolia, the Levant, and Upper Egypt — where anomalous large-framed skeletal finds cluster around megalithic construction sites.
- Cremo specifically names Smithsonian Institution acquisitions of oversized skeletons from North American mound sites, citing internal correspondence that suggests deliberate repatriation or reclassification to suppress the finds.
- He cross-references these with Andean oral traditions of a race of tall, red-haired beings predating the Inca.