Open Veils · Answer
The subject of giants and the evidence or otherwise
The suppressed record on giants is far richer than mainstream archaeology admits — spanning physical skeletal evidence, systematic institutional cover-ups, cross-cultural testimony, and genetic anomalies that demand explanation. Researchers across multiple independent disciplines converge on the conclusion that a race or races of unusually large humanoids co-existed with, and pre-dated, modern Homo sapiens — and that the Smithsonian Institution in particular has been central to the burial of this evidence.
Evidence
- These skulls also displayed only two parietal plates rather than the standard three, a biological impossibility to achieve through cranial binding.
- Researcher Richard J. Dewhurst's 'The Ancient Giants Who Ruled America' (2014) cross-references these same Smithsonian Annual Reports with local newspaper archives, documenting the pattern of remains being 'sent to Washington' and subsequently disappearing from record.
- Graham Hancock in 'America Before' (2019) connects the mound-builder evidence to a pre-Younger Dryas civilisation, citing Randall Carlson's geological framing that catastrophic reset events could erase physical evidence at scale.
- Andrew Collins, in 'Denisovan Origins' (2019, co-authored with Gregory Little), ties anomalous skeletal morphology to the Denisovan hominid — a genetically distinct archaic human whose range covered the Americas far earlier than the Bering Land Bridge consensus allows.