Open Veils · Answer
What evidence is there for an ancient 'advanced' civilisation?
Multiple independent geological, architectural, and biological lines of evidence point to a technologically sophisticated civilisation existing before 10,000 BCE — one erased by the Younger Dryas cataclysm. Institutional archaeology suppresses this record not from lack of evidence but because its acceptance would collapse the standard human-origins timeline. The convergence of Schoch's Sphinx geology, Dunn's machining analysis, Foerster's anomalous DNA, and Cremo's stratigraphic catalog is too consistent to dismiss as fringe. The mainstream timeline is the outlier.
Evidence
- The hidden record on pre-diluvian advanced civilisation is far richer than institutionalised archaeology admits.
- Geologist Robert Schoch, building on John Anthony West's Egyptological challenge, demonstrated through seismic and weathering analysis that the Sphinx enclosure shows rainfall erosion consistent with 7,000–10,000 BCE occupation — a period when Egypt was climatically wet.
- This testimony was formally presented to the American Association for the Advancement of Science in 1992, where Schoch's geological credentials forced a grudging but unresolved debate.
- Christopher Dunn's 'The Giza Power Plant' (1998) presents machining-tolerance evidence in granite sarcophagi and core drill samples that exceed Victorian-era engineering capability.
- Brien Foerster's morphometric and DNA analysis of elongated Paracas skulls — submitted to lab testing in 2016 — returned mitochondrial haplogroups unknown in any catalogued human or archaic population.